50a) Tämän lain mukaan suojatun teoksen suojana olevaa tehokasta teknistä toimenpidettä, jonka teoksen tekijä tai joku muu tekijän luvalla teosta yleisön saataviin saattaessaan on teoksen suojaksi asettanut, ei saa kiertää.
Hypo: A record that has two songs. First song is composed by the pop star A that performs the song. The second song is classic cover by composer X. Rights to the song were bought from heavy drinker songwriter X by publisher Y. With out permission from X the record isn't considered to have technical protection measure. Hence you could circumvent it with out being criminal.
You would also need a permission from each and every author / creator to make the protection fall under the new copyright law. Hence it is impossible to get authorization from dead creators (like Beatles) who haven't all ready given their authorization.
What is the effect? Having just one record that has protection not protected by law authorises discussion forums and distribution of programms for circumvention purposes.
Could it be that the copyright lobby missed a detail?